Showing posts with label netflix. Show all posts
Showing posts with label netflix. Show all posts

Thursday, December 7, 2017

Today's Links

I've got a long day ahead of me today, including a conference call this evening until around 7:30. But here are the links I have sitting open that I'll read/watch/do later:


Tuesday, June 20, 2017

He's No Frank Underwood

Two special elections are happening today: one in the 6th Congressional district of Georgia - the race receiving the most attention - and one in the 5th Congressional district of South Carolina, which happens to be the home district of fictional politician, Frank Underwood of Netflix's House of Cards. And Democrat Archie Parnell seems to be having a great time highlighting this connection. Check out this campaign ad:


Harry Enten of FiveThirtyEight explains why this special election matters, despite receiving less attention:
Voters in the South Carolina 5th are choosing between Republican Ralph Norman, a former state representative, and Democrat Archie Parnell, a former Goldman Sachs managing director who has been using ads parodying Underwood to draw attention to his campaign.

[T]his is not the type of district where Democrats tend to be competitive. It’s not even the type of district where they need to be competitive to win the House next year. Democrats need a net gain of only 24 seats from the Republicans to do that. And there are 111 districts won by Republican House candidates in 2016 that leaned more Democratic than the South Carolina 5th.

There hasn’t been a lot of polling of the South Carolina race, but what we do have shows that Parnell is outperforming the district’s default partisan lean, just not by nearly enough.

Even if Norman wins, as expected, we will still learn something about the state of U.S. politics. As I’ve written before, when one party consistently outperforms expectations in special elections in the runup to a midterm election, that party tends to do well in those midterms.

So keep an eye on how much Parnell loses by (assuming he loses). The closer Norman comes to beating Parnell by 19 points (or more) — the default partisan lean of the district — the better for the Republican Party. A Parnell loss in the low double digits, by contrast, would be consistent with a national shift big enough for Democrats to win the House.

Thursday, May 25, 2017

Psychological Science in Boston

I just arrived in Boston earlier this afternoon to attend the annual meeting of the Association for Psychological Science. I'll have details on the conference tomorrow. While they had events and workshops earlier today, these were mostly pre-conference activities. I attended the official opening reception earlier this evening. Here's some photo highlights of the day:

The view from my hotel

Some great psychology buttons I found at the opening reception 

A beautiful old church I walked by on my way back to the hotel

The hotel bar

And dessert

In fact I'm enjoying dessert right now. After this, I'll head back up to my room for some reading and/or Netflix before heading to bed.

Friday, May 5, 2017

Concert Weekend

I'm busily finishing up a project for work, so I haven't had time to blog the last couple days. But I'm in for a busy weekend; my choir has two concerts, one tonight and another Sunday.


The concert will feature works and performance by composer Jeff Beal, who has composed music for many shows and movies. In fact, I'm working from home today and have one of the shows he's composed (and won an Emmy) for, House of Cards, on in the background. His wife, soprano Joan (whose voice is often featured on House of Cards) will also be performing with us.

The music we'll be singing tonight and Sunday is quite different from the music you hear on House of Cards, but you can really see his jazz background in some of the music, with extra crunchy chords and jazz-style improvisation.

Tickets are still available! If you're in the Chicagoland area, you can catch us tonight at the beautiful Fourth Presbyterian (across from the Hancock building) or Sunday at Alice Millar Chapel on Northwestern University's campus.

Tuesday, May 2, 2017

Mental Illness and Art

By now, you've probably at least heard of, if not watched, 13 Reasons Why, a series on Netflix that chronicles a set of tapes created by Hannah Baker to explain why she committed suicide. These tapes make it to our protagonist, Clay Jensen, a friend of Hannah's, and we learn about the events taking place prior to and after her suicide. It was a difficult series for me to watch - I had a cousin who committed suicide after his 30th birthday party, which coincidentally was also the day I graduated college. I awoke the next day to the news. A friend of mine who also experienced a family suicide mentioned that she was meaning to watch the show, and I passed on some trigger warnings for her. It's a difficult show to watch for anyone, but for people who have experienced firsthand the grief displayed by the characters of the show, especially Hannah's parents, it can bring back many conflicting emotions.

I do mean to sit down and write a review of the show. I think I need a little more distance, because I know I'm still feeling through many of emotions the show triggered. One thing the show has done is, it has started to get people talking about mental illness. In fact, that's what good art does - gets people thinking and talking about the human condition. In fact, two articles have crossed my path today, dealing with negative emotions more broadly and mental illness specifically.

The first is an interview with psychologist Susan David, whose book Emotional Agility deals with the importance of negative emotions, including in workplace settings. She argues that negative emotions should not be suppressed, because they can provide important information for the feeler and his/her coworkers:
A core part of emotional agility is the idea that our emotions are critical; they help us and our organizations. For example, if a person is upset that their idea was stolen at work, that’s a sign that they value fairness. Instead of being good or bad emotions, we should see emotions as containing useful data.
Our moods can provide us with important information - in fact, we refer to this in psychology as the "mood as information effect." If we realize we're in a negative mood, we analyze the situation to see what the cause could be. This mood is an indicator that something isn't right. Of course, Dr. David is going beyond mood as information and discussing how those emotions could inform others about what the person values. Further - and I'm sure she goes into this in her book - suppressing emotions can lead to thought suppression effects, where the suppressed emotions become stronger and more salient. The cognitive stress of suppressing would also make it more difficult for a person to do their job, especially jobs that require more critical thinking.

The other article deals with mental illness among artists, and asks whether pain is necessary to create great art:
Artists are masochists. We revel in the beauty of pain more than any other profession in the world. It's an experience we create for our viewers that is almost palpable. And it is in this experience that we connect to each other, creating everlasting bonds with our audience.

Some of the world's greatest artists have documented their own struggles with mental health. From depression and anxiety to a wide range of psychological disorders, these are all real themes that will always remain in art.
The article, written by artist Melody Nieves, who has struggled with depression herself, includes many great works of art, some familiar and some likely not, that deal with different aspects of mental illness and emotional pain:

Friday, November 11, 2016

Days and Days and Days

How much Netflix do you watch? Depending on how many Netflix binges you're guilty of (and I know I'm guilty of many), you may be interested in knowing just how much Netflix the average viewer watches in a year, a number that has shown a steady increase over the years:
The number of hours of Netflix the average subscriber watches has gone up steadily since 2011, at an average of 16.4% per year. In 2011, using Netflix data, we can estimate that each subscriber watched about 51 minutes of Netflix per day (about 310 hours per year). And while official Netflix data hasn't come out yet for this year, CordCutting.com estimated that for 2016, users are on track to stream 600 hours of content each, on average.

If that's true, it means that the average Netflix subscriber watches about 12 DAYS more Netflix in a year than they did in 2011!
This is a good sign for Netflix's decision to release more original content, which they started doing in 2013. Not surprising, considering that their Marvel Cinematic Universe contributions, as well as the recent show Stranger Things, are some of the best shows I've seen recently. Next on my list is The Crown.

What are you binge-watching at the moment?